this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
3 points (100.0% liked)
Geophysics
193 readers
2 users here now
Geophysics community, not restricted to Canada.
General rules: must be geophysics related or adjacent (this is a very wide scope, and includes things like stellar earthquakes); must adhere to lemmy.ca moderation rules; no pseudoscience.
See also [email protected]
And: [email protected]
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You can't really tune it for any of those things. It's much like medical imaging-- you get an unknown blob. In medical imaging, you get a sequence like "this blob is shaped like a bone, so it is almost certainly a bone, but this blob is unknown so we're ordering a biopsy". Here you're effectively do the same, but the patient is the ground.
Like medical imaging, you can sometimes choose different methods (X-ray, CT scan, ultrasound, MRI, etc.) -- the different methods are sensitive to different physical contrasts. So if you do multiple scans with different methods, you can improve your interpretations. Likewise, with geophysics, you can use radar, seismic (sound waves), magnetics, even MRI (also known as nuclear magnetic resonance in the physics community). Basically, you need auxillary data to start distinguishing between things well. Sometimes that auxillary data is "I'm expecting to find a storage tank here due to historical records, and sure enough, I find a shape here where it is supposed to be, so let's assume it is the tank."
Ah that makes good sense. In my mind I'm just gonna imagine its a big cool gound x-ray cannon. I can imagine it's good fun to have a look into the ground and see what's there. Thanks for explaining it to me. I'm a much more mechanical person