this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2021
37 points (100.0% liked)

Lemmy

12715 readers
69 users here now

Everything about Lemmy; bugs, gripes, praises, and advocacy.

For discussion about the lemmy.ml instance, go to [email protected].

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
37
What are your most wanted Lemmy features? (github.com)
submitted 3 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
78 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

While @[email protected] and I do have a lot of issues that are going to take us a lot of time this upcoming year, its still useful for us to hear what your most desired features for Lemmy are, and prioritize them.

If they're smaller, we could get to them fairly quickly, or others wanting to contribute could see whats most wanted.

Outside of just posting them here, make sure github issues exist for them (this is what we work from), and do a thumbs up react for all the ones you'd like. Despite being a popular project, we have very few people voting on these issues . We can then use the link above (issues sorted by most thumbs up ), to keep track.

Thanks all.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 3 years ago (1 children)

We've recently removed that logging line, which logged all websocket requests. But yes most importantly, the database stores no plaintext passwords.

You don't want to client side hash passwords before sending, because different clients might not do it the same way. But also we have to add oauth at some point, so 3rd party clients don't even have to know your pass. This is less important with open source apps imo, which are the only ones we're gonna link to anyway, but it'd be nice to have.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 3 years ago

That's very nice. Thank you for your hard work! I am curious about oauth. I did not know that 3 rd party clients needed to know the password, I will look into that!