Anarchism

3858 readers

2 users here now

Are you an Anarchist? The answer might surprise you!

Rules:

Be respectful
Don't be a nazi
Argue about the point and not the person
This is not the place to debate the merits of anarchism itself. While discussion is encouraged, getting in your “epic dunks on the anarkiddies” is not. As a result of the instance’s poor moderation policies and hostility toward anarchists by default, lemmygrad users are encouraged not to post here, though not explicitly disallowed if they aren’t just looking to start a fight.

See also:

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

the US is a deeply broken country (www.reddit.com)

submitted 3 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

27 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 years ago

Then why do you still live in such a country?

I have to live somewhere. I don't know of any that are better, just different kinds of "bad". You seem to believe "living better" is an objective thing, but it is subjective of course. And you and I don't want to live the same way. If you bothered to see things from my perspective, you'd understand how silly your question is.

You have the wrong idea of what having a public welfare service means. I don’t need welfare checks to live here

You have lived so long in the system that it's invisible to you. The welfare no longer looks like welfare. It's just an entitlement to you. You deserve it. You've earned it. Just by being there. They owe it to you. Once you've adopted that mindset, how can it ever be welfare again? But from the other end, how can your government even engage in charity? For them, you have become livestock they have a duty to keep fed.

And my children will be able to study in any university even if I don’t earn enough money to pay for it

It used to be the case in the US. But somewhere the politicians got the idea that sending 100% of the population to university was not just an ideal or even a goal, but an absolute requirement.

Opportunity costs being what they are, the price skyrocketed. It actually costs more than twice as much to send twice as many kids to college. And so the price rose. And colleges became more competitive for those dollars, but to stay competitive they have to be nicer colleges with nicer dorms and nicer campuses and nicer amenities. But those things cost more, so the costs were passed on to the students who were indoctrinated to believe that if they didn't go they'd be losers. And then bankruptcy for student loans was rescinded, and grants turned into loans that can't ever be defaulted.

Perverse incentives are a removed.

I can't tell which European country you're from, and you don't have to tell me, but all students don't go to university there either. We can be honest, can't we?