-26
Biden’s TSA Designates Special Airport Screening Line for Migrants Without Required ID
(www.breitbart.com)
this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
-26 points (6.7% liked)
Conservative
432 readers
56 users here now
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Rule 3 violation.
Next time, just make whatever argument you're trying to make, like...why are news stories from white nationalist publications bad? Tedious, I know...but do it.
I'm not going to soften my language towards white nationalists.
And you should be ashamed of assisting in whitewashing conservative rhetoric.
Can you show that they are white nationalist?
Yeah, maybe that "black crime" tag was just when their profits exceeded their expenses.
There's no black crime tag? What are you talking about?
So if they had tagged stories as "black crime," you'd agree with me?
Yes. What are you getting at? Is there something I should know about them?
Have a look back at their archives.
Here's a random day that I pulled.
They don't have the tag anymore, but I'm not going to defend them, that's rotten beyond all hell that they would ever have it in the first place.
I'll try and keep that in mind, avoid them.
So we're in agreement that they're a White Nationalist publication?
Are you removing them from the whitelisted sites?
From 2016.
Oh, well then that settles it.
Good thing they don't still post racist propaganda bullshit.
And now you know why I don't bother with you.
You realize even CNN posts racist things using your criteria. When everyone is a racist, there is no racist.
You really don't see the problem with an editor making a "black crime" tag? You're really going to defend this shit?
Jesus Fucking Christ.
Guess we can post fucking StormFront here then since EvErYbOdY iS rAcIsT.
I see it from 2016 without any context. While I googled, Science.com said they were not a white nationalist site. I see a lot of accusations but very few facts.
I see many liberal sites claiming all white people are racists, which is not only false but highly racist.
You have to be a special kind of dense to pretend like a nationalist website that has featured a section on black crime isn't a white nationalist publication.
There's literally nothing that would change your mind, which is why I don't bother trying.
But I'm glad you showed your ass so that people can see how honest you aren't.
Yes? Thats what I just said. I didn't know it, and I learned.
What's your point?
Are you going to remove their posts as if they were a "leftist" site?
Or do you still consider them a good source? Do you think it's good that you're promoting a White Nationalist site?
How does this newfound knowledge change your opinion on the article that you posted?
I dont remove leftist sites, I remove leftist stories. There is a difference, albeit leftist sites usually run leftist stories, just like right wing sites usually run right wing stories. Hell, iirc I removed two fox news articles.
For the record, removals and deletions dont actually federate properly, just like how reports don't federate properly, so its kinda moot.
I think its going to be on a case by case basis, albeit with a lot of scrutiny. I didnt know about the tag, and I doubt many others know either.
This is the same circular conversation I had. Won’t cite anything. Says it’s on you to go find it
And you did.
But you apparently still think they're fine.