-27
this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
-27 points (17.1% liked)
Conservative
432 readers
111 users here now
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Would they pay for their own education? But yeah, weighing the consequences of a bunch of ignorant people running around is important, too.
Well they don't know in many cases. I put my kid in a private school.
I pay taxes to support the schools where I live now. The schools are fairly crappy in my opinion. The kids don't score well on tests but they know every gender and sexuality out there.
The conservatives are trying to take over the school board to fix that. School is a serious topic and more money isn't always the answer. The number one indicator is parent involvement for academic success. Something conservatives preach and liberals despise.
We have a local psychiatrist going for re-election on the board. It was funny to see liberals claim he wasn't qualified to talk about mental health issues such as sexuality and gender. Tthat teachers are better trained to handle those discussions. smh