this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2022
12 points (80.0% liked)

World News

33108 readers
608 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A QAnon and anti-vaccine podcaster has died from complications due to COVID-19 after contracting the virus at a conspiracy theory conference that turned into a superspreader event, and where fellow attendees baselessly blamed their illness on an anthrax attack.

The Herman Cain Award goes to....

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -4 points 3 years ago (14 children)

Oh really? Safe and effective, huh? Not like big pharam has ever lied about their product safety or bribed doctors to prescribe more meds. Why was Pfarma trying to push release of the data from their studies until 75 years from now? How many years of safety data exists for mRNA based vaccine use in humans? But go ahead, run interference for big pharma if you want while they reap billions in profits during a pandemic with a product that doesn't work. You do you I guess.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (13 children)

I could bother debating with you extensively, but it appears you have resorted to the Gish gallop. There's already lots of research by credible sources (such health authorities) around the world regarding the efficacy COVID vaccines, vaccines that have been given for a year now.

Why was Pfarma trying to push release of the data from their studies until 75 years from now?

https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/paramount-importance-judge-orders-fda-hasten-release-pfizer-vaccine-docs-2022-01-07/

This isn't "Pfarma's" fault, FDA's department reviewing FOIA requests is understaffed.

How many years of safety data exists for mRNA based vaccine use in humans?

How many years would satisfy you? Here's loooooong analysis regarding 3 massive COVID MRNA vaccine studies.

https://medium.com/microbial-instincts/mrna-vaccine-safety-and-risks-a-one-year-update-from-the-u-s-u-k-and-israel-20402f345dca

In summary:

After nearly a year since mass vaccination began, we now have a better understanding of the mRNA (and DNA) vaccine’s safety profile. Yes, those vaccines have risks. But like any medical intervention, such risks must be weighed against the risks of infection or benefits of vaccination. This risk-benefit assessment may differ substantially in some people, but for the overwhelming majority, vaccines are the more reasonable choice.

a product that doesn’t work

https://nyti.ms/3Gcf4U2

Here's one brilliant example why you are wrong.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 years ago (2 children)

Even the republican party in the US has started promoting vaccines because too many of their voters have died, lmao

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 years ago (1 children)

No because both the repuplicans and the Democrats are funded by bug pharma. Mass psychosis is real.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 years ago

Sure thing bro

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)