Open Source

32782 readers

588 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

What text editor are you using? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 3 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

94 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I've used VS Code for a long time, but have recently grown weary of Microsoft's approach to OSS. I've checked out VS Codium which seems like it might be a great option.

What text editor are you using?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 years ago (1 children)

they only have around 150 employees

So, they would need to build up a lot of expertise.

So, yeah, you kind of need to continue innovating, which requires manpower.

You would pretty much need to poach these employees, or build up a huge team of your own, to be able to move the project in a different direction.

Now, this seems to be more about the manpower needed to mantain a browser that about the open-source or free (or in fact even community-driven) natures of Chromium. Is there anything that makes Firefox more opensource than Chromium?

And even if that is not the case, a handful of frustrated community members can probably outperform the current maintainers.

LibreOffice

Again, even departing from the strict opensource definition, I think that how much a project is free come from the possibility to have a fork that works, not necessarily one that can compete with the original project. Is it necessarily a good thing if the development team of a projects can be outperformed by "a handful of frustrated community members"?

In fact, is your point that it would be better if there were no professional developers and only projects run by communities of hobbyists?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 years ago (1 children)

Is there anything that makes Firefox more opensource than Chromium?

Well, that's why I didn't name Firefox as a particularly good example of open-source, just a reference for the manpower needed.

I do think, they work more in the open than Chromium. And because the Mozilla Foundation is legally a non-profit (of which the Mozilla Corporation is a 100% subsidiary), they don't really have that profit-motive behind their decisions (they can only use money to pay their employees or to develop their projects further), so they tend to make decisions more in line with the open-source expectation. But yeah, I would still certainly prefer, if more of the development was done by the wider community.

In fact, is your point that it would be better if there were no professional developers and only projects run by communities of hobbyists?

Nah, I would just like it, if companies wouldn't tout their projects being open-source, when that's basically just misleading many users. Which is most definitely a lost cause, so that's why I'm in favor of just letting the "open-source" term die and finding a better word.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 years ago

Well, that’s why I didn’t name Firefox as a particularly good example of open-source, just a reference for the manpower needed.

Is there a good example of open-source web browser? For example, what do you use as a browser?

More generally, is there anything that passes you "hard fork" test for another reason than the scale effect? Is there any sign that the frustrated community members are more talented if the maintainer is hired by a non-profit rather than a private company?

Nah, I would just like it, if companies wouldn’t tout their projects being open-source, when that’s basically just misleading many users.

There is a precise definition of what is open source. If users think it encompasses more, that's a problem of communication from part of the open source community.

just letting the “open-source” term die and finding a better word

Do you really think there is no advantage of a program being open source? Don't you think it is a good thing that the online community can check the source code, fork it to remove the bits they don't like, install a previous version if they don't like the new one? Would you prefer if there was no open source Chromium, no ungoogled-chromium, no soft forks of it, so that one would need to run Chrome if they need to use an app developped for Chrome?

Do you exclusively use software that is designed by communities rather than companies?