this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Dungeons and Dragons

318 readers
1 users here now

A place for D&D (and related systems) discussion, rules lawyering, minmaxing, art, anecdotes, homebrew reviews, and more!

No sharing of copyrighted material. Please keep it SFW.

CC licensed 5.1 D&D 5e Core Rules

See also [email protected] and [email protected]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This was a table I put together for a campaign I was playing a druid in. The DM and I wanted to remove the ambiguity around the spell -- whether the animal is chosen by DM or Player. So we made a table for the lowest level casting, assuming temperate forest or similar terrain. Thoughts on this solution?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sure, it works. I tend to be a "Bucket of Fun" DM. While I appreciate letting the dice decide, this is one of those instances where I feel giving the player some agency can lead to wildly unpredicatble outcomes. I like to let my players explore all possible outcomes, but I'm also never really in danger of them breaking the game. To me, the list just ends up feeling like a glorified Bag of Tricks.

[โ€“] troyunrau 1 points 2 years ago

Fair enough! I created it when I was a player and the DM didn't like the idea of the player picking their summons. And it was created as a compromise. When I'm DMing, I prefer to let my players run buck wild :)