this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
-29 points (17.8% liked)

Conservative

432 readers
66 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The SCOTUS needs to take this or a case like it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You claim there is harm, what harm is there?

You claim you don’t have a strong opinion, but you want the highest court in the land’s opinion on what should be a settled matter? Seems like you have a pretty strong opinion, you just don’t want to vocalize it.

If you remove genitals and sex from the equation (something you said to do), what about gender-affirming bathrooms makes them an unsafe space for women? Because at this point we’re talking chromosomal differences and nothing else.