Conservative
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
view the rest of the comments
I am still baffled you think nobody was doing anything before the bill. You really think we needed to spend another billion on something already handled by law enforcement?
Did you say?
Do you not even realize the things you say? It was being enforced before the bill. SO it makes your statement baffling.
Did you say?
If it doesn’t get funded, how will it be enforced?
Do you not even realize the things you say? It was being enforced before the bill. SO it makes your statement baffling.
I repeated exactly what you said. I didn’t “make” anything up. Way to back track from a stupid statement.
I thought it was clear. You didn’t understand we have been fighting human traffic for many years without this bill. I just find it baffling you were that ignorant on the topic. That’s us all.
So you deny saying the statement? Funny you have to resort to name calling over a statement so stupid, it had to be called out.
Fartington:
Warning for violation of rule #1.