this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2024
29 points (100.0% liked)

Linguistics

592 readers
2 users here now

Welcome to the community about the science of human Language!

Everyone is welcome here: from laymen to professionals, Historical linguists to discourse analysts, structuralists to generativists.

Rules:

  1. Stay on-topic. Specially for more divisive subjects.
  2. Post sources whenever reasonable to do so.
  3. Avoid crack theories and pseudoscientific claims.
  4. Have fun!

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What an interesting read. Tbh I never paid much thought about how ancient scripts might have been deciphered and it is even more awesome than I would have anticipated.

One thing that is not clear to me, however: The text says

Because Linear B is a syllabary, and not an alphabet

The text does not go into detail about how this could have been known to the researchers. Anybody got a hint for me here?

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

By the number of different glyphs that you find. Alphabets and abjads typically have 20~30 glyphs, syllabaries around 80~200, and logographic systems have at least a few hundreds.

That's also how we know that the Voynich manuscript is written in an alphabet, even if nobody deciphered it yet.