this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
35 points (97.3% liked)

CanadaPolitics

2238 readers
112 users here now

Placeholder for any r/CanadaPolitics refugees

Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bionicjoey 15 points 2 years ago (5 children)

What even is the "intimidation"? FB and Google threatening to stop hosting news in Canada? I thought that was literally the intended effect of the law. How is it intimidation?

It's like if you made playing hopscotch illegal and then people were like "If you don't change that law back, we won't play hopscotch anymore. Then you'll be sorry!" That's literally the point my dudes.

[–] oneofthemladygoats 10 points 2 years ago (4 children)

The intended effect was to create a revenue stream for traditional media players, so saying "our way or we're out" is, in fact, an attempt to coerce the outcome they want.

tbh I'm kind of hoping fb and google stick to their guns if only so that it solidifies their reputation as a source only for misinformation.

[–] HappyExodus 2 points 2 years ago

The problem is, they will still distribute foxnews and every nonCanadian news.

Which will replace everything they are removing ATM.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)