Linux

51666 readers

436 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Was Arch used to be harder? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 4 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

tl;dr Title

It's common knowledge at this point that Arch has a reputation for being very difficult to use which led to it becoming a meme ( like everything else on the internet). Even tho Arch users swear that it is actually trivial to install and use for someone who is willing to read documentation, it is also known that distributions with significantly higher requirements on overall *nix knowledge like Gentoo, Oasis, KISS and Crux (?) exist. So my question is this: was Arch used to be harder to install and use? Because I heard bad things about Debian's installation process too, even tho it is incredibly easy now. I also hear Ubuntu being bad for user privacy, even tho that whole Amazon thing happened years ago under a completely different management. Things move fast in Linux family's world, was Arch a very different system back in 2006?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 years ago

I think, it's a result of the Dunning-Kruger-Effect: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect

Someone who's installed a normal end-user distro has no reason to be confident.

Someone who's installed Gentoo and the like has all the reasons to be confident, but recognizes how much there is still to learn, and that they really know nothing in comparison, so they don't brag about it.

Someone who's installed Arch has made that first step towards knowledge, so they can be more confident than a complete noob, but they haven't yet realized that there is still so much more out there, so they feel like they've conquered the world and completely overshoot in how confident they should be.

And I guess, there's also the quantity factor. There's just a lot less people who (manage to) install Gentoo et al, so less people who could brag about it.