Did you know that the Japanese were emboldened to first-strike Pearl Harbor by their success in crippling the Russian navy in the Russo-Japanese War? That's an all-out surprise attack to disable a stronger opponent. You're claiming more of a limited-violence sortie for humanitarian reasons. Isn't that exactly what you accuse NATO of?

[–] gun@lemmy.ml -2 points 3 years ago (1 children)

I only make the comparison because the point of Pearl Harbor was to demilitarize the US by destroying our navy without invading the US mainland. That's where the comparison ends. If you believe the US and Ukrainian governments, this was not a surprise attack. They have been saying they knew this was coming for months.

[–] ArchimedesTesseract@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 years ago

The evidence that Russian troops had been massing at the Ukrainian border was overwhelming. Putin himself confirmed that there were troops, otherwise he couldn't confirm that one unit was being withdrawn. So, yeah, the US and Ukrainian governments are quite believable in that regard.