Technology
This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.
Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.
Rules:
1: All Lemmy rules apply
2: Do not post low effort posts
3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff
4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.
5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)
6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist
7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed
view the rest of the comments
It is a Mastodon fork, and I am still waiting to see if this apparent SQL-injection issue will also come up with regular Mastodon instances.
Well at least Eugene has stated that the vulnerability doesn't seem to be related to mastodon's codebase, and that GAB wouldn't even install the security patches.
Does this also apply to postgresql? That's the default recommended for vanilla masto.
There's basically no details on the SQL injection attack, so it's hard to tell. SQL injection attacks in general can occur independent of the database, but yeah, we don't even know if it even applies to Mastodon.
FWIW, some of the people involved have suggested that Gab introduced vulnerabilities while modifying the Mastodon code.
See here.
Arstechnica has some more details. https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/03/rookie-coding-mistake-prior-to-gab-hack-came-from-sites-cto/
Oh boy, that's a lot of hand-written SQL, and they even just commented out the old code.
No idea, sorry.
Most Mastodon users are pseudonymous, so in theory it shouldn't be as bad there. Probably I'm just being naive tho.