120
The Supreme Court Doesn’t Care That the Gay Wedding Website Case Is Based on Fiction
(newrepublic.com)
@politics on kbin.social is a magazine to share and discuss current events news, opinion/analysis, videos, or other informative content related to politicians, politics, or policy-making at all levels of governance (federal, state, local), both domestic and international. Members of all political perspectives are welcome here, though we run a tight ship. Community guidelines and submission rules were co-created between the Mod Team and early members of @politics. Please read all community guidelines and submission rules carefully before engaging our magazine.
This is a really weird narrative some people are trying to push.
The conflict was between Smith and the government, so she sued the government. It could be that her explanation of the motivation is made up, but that's fairly irrelevant. The question was does she have a right to advertise something on her website about her business.
I also feel like the panic over this is a bit strange. I think a gay web designer, for example, should have every right to say "I won't make websites for Bible camps that support conversation therapy", and advertise that on their own website, despite the fact that religion is a protected class.
This ruling, as far as I can tell, secures that right.