Is it the age of the game? Is it the generation of the console you play on? Is it a combination of the two?
I recently learned about an ongoing commercial development scene for the NES long past when Nintendo dropped official support for it, and it got me wondering about this. There are new games still being published for the NES that I can buy as a physical cartridge. I bought one last month in person from a physical store.
It feels retro to play this game on original hardware, but in reality it didn't exist until 2021. Does the fact I can play it on an NES make it retro, or does the game being only 2 years old mean that it's clearly not?
On the other hand, classic games are re-released in collections on modern systems all the time. These games definitely feel retro, but the console you're playing on certainly isn't.
Is there anywhere a line can be definitively drawn here, or is retro gaming more of a feeling than something that can be locked down to one definition? I wanted to get some opinions on this, what do you guys think?
For me, I consider anything before the NES "Antique," NES - N64/PSX "Retro," GameCube/PS2 - Wii/PS3 "Classic," and everything after is "Modern."
So a new game for the NES in your opinion wouldn't be retro, I can see that argument for sure. In the case that the new game is made to be played on original hardware and made with all the same limitations as games had back then, would you consider that to still be "retro gaming"? If not, would you say the age of the game is the most important factor or is there something else I'm missing?