this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
171 points (84.3% liked)

science

18235 readers
141 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There are other things in that which are bad for you.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would if I weren’t going to bed. Feel free to ignore me. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's pretty interesting how many walls of text you'll write to defend an unnecessary additive but not to prove you should just drink water

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Another straw man.

straw man fallacy (sometimes written as strawman) is the informal fallacy of refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion, while not recognizing or acknowledging the distinction.[1]One who engages in this fallacy is said to be "attacking a straw man".

The typical straw man argument creates the illusion of having refuted or defeated an opponent's proposition through the covert replacement of it with a different proposition (i.e., "stand up a straw man") and the subsequent refutation of that false argument ("knock down a straw man") instead of the opponent's proposition.[2][3] Straw man arguments have been used throughout history in polemical debate, particularly regarding highly charged emotional subjects.[4]