A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy π
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
Taylor Swift started out around the same time as the Hannah Montana show, so not that one.
Taylor Swift and her team have too much business savvy to follow a 00s Disney show as a template, so not number two.
Trying to cram real life people and things into "jungian archetypes" is reductionist and the online, self-taught philosophist bro's version of astrology.
I'll take "reading too much into coincidences" for $1,000, Alex.
You overlooked the most important question: who gives a fuck?
I donβt know and I donβt care.
No
I couldβve sworn I heard of a Hannah Montana-type show/character years before the show came out..
Dolly Parton is a real life example.
All I know about jungian psychology comes from a weird french animation show called crisis Jung, which basically amounts to nothing since I barely understood the madness on the screen.
Crisis Jung - Trailer : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idb6piuKIug
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
https://www.piped.video/watch?v=idb6piuKIug
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.
Dats wild
I mean, this is a joke, clearly. So, I vote for both.
Jung's work is too derivative. If you want to be taken seriously, coach it in terms of Freud's theories.
ROFL!
Maybe
All I know is that somehow Miley Cyrus has already ruined her face, somehow.
How? It doesn't look like she has had any surgery or injections.
All I see is different make-up and haircut styles.