this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
604 points (99.2% liked)

World News

36787 readers
593 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 126 points 2 years ago (4 children)

For people not reading the article, Twitter was facing a class action lawsuit, but they successfully sued to force employees to go through arbitration, which avoids a class action suit. Only problem is that arbitration rules say the employee has to pay a small fee for filing, but the company has to pay the arbitration costs. Twitter filed to force the costs to be split with the employee, but the organization that overseas arbitration said that's against their rules and has refused to engage in any arbitration activities that Twitter isn't paying for. The pricetag could be millions, and Twitter is simply not paying, so now the employees are suing to force Twitter to pay.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 years ago (2 children)

How forced an arbitration even legal. I don't get it.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 years ago

It is not legal for employees alleging sexual assault or harassment. Because Congress passed a law making that illegal. Also, it is not legal for baggage handlers, because the Supreme Court said there's an exemption for working in interstate commerce. IIRC Congress tried to ban it across the board last year, but it died in the Senate and then the House flipped so there won't be another chance for a few years at least.

[–] Poob 14 points 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 years ago (2 children)

thank you 🙏
I wish there was a TLDR bot on Lemmy

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

I’ve seen one around some places, don’t remember where though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

Makes sense to me

[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Dude is the richest person in the world. Penny pinching and denying his former employees their due when he rapidly raises his wealth is outright evil. Well, I guess there is a reason why no good human ever accumulates hundreds of billion dollars. If you are good, your conscience will force you to use your wealth to make other's lives better and you will lose your big B tag.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago

That's exactly how you get wealthy. Screw anyone you can, threaten them with eternal lawsuits, and you can get a huge discount on labour and other costs. Trump was famous for pulling the same shit.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

Totally drinking the Gospel of Wealth Kool aid. You grind as much money as possible doing evil shit and then give a bunch of money away when you're old so people remember you well and you get to direct the world through philanthropy. Carnegie 101

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

It's not even just accumulating and giving that money away due to conscience. Nobody with a conscience could do what it takes to accumulated that large sum of wealth in the first place. You have to stomp on people and actively hurt the people around you.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 years ago

It's nice to see labor fighting back. Especially against odds stacked against them.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago

No surprise there. That's how rich stays rich

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago

It's like, he doesn't know whether or not it's going to work, so delays paying anybody (except obviously the lawyers) as long as possible. When it really doesn't work out, nobody gets paid. If it somewhat works out, he negotiates the payment down. Do you want it, or do you want more delay?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

I'm a little surprised that Twitter can just refuse to come to the table without simply losing by default. But I suppose they wrote the terms of the arbitration agreement, so... not that surprised.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

It's nice to see labor fighting back. Especially against odds stacked against them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago
load more comments
view more: next ›