this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2023
302 points (99.3% liked)

196

17328 readers
1901 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

fappa-fappa-fappa-fappa-fappa-fapppa-fappa

[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 year ago

"Arky" is an appropriately non-binary name.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Its a shame the skin tight unitards mever caught on with the fellas. Thats a dapper suit right there.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Beat sound to Nick’s blastin

Is that jerking off to gay porn?

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

That would be molecules, I guess.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

ah yes, the super futuristic and far off future of the year 2000

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Technically, the early 2050s. So there's still time.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why am I getting the vibe that these predictions will still be wrong?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Have any of these predictions ever been right?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I mean, if you want a list, here you go

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Idk, probably.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why did we ever stop writing dumb puns on old cars?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

Brb, keying "Racket Ship" onto mine really quick.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

lol. no cooking after burners

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Both of them appear to have broken their spines

Her foot appears to be pointing at the car, her knee to the right of the image, her torso front-right, and her head facing left

His legs look like he's just started to turn towards the car but his body is still going straight on to the right

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

It's because they were "cooking with super-atomic radiation".

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sir I would like to remind you that humans can twist themselves at the waist.

Though in fairness there’s no way to balance the way she is depicted.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I thought this was AI generated because of the terrible anatomy...

How does such a respected, experienced comic artist fuck up basic human forns this badly?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

'Where are her organs?'

At home.

Future!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

I bet her check engine light is on.