this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2023
302 points (99.3% liked)

196

17334 readers
2542 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ummthatguy@startrek.website 55 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 year ago

fappa-fappa-fappa-fappa-fappa-fapppa-fappa

[–] GuyDudeman@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago

"Arky" is an appropriately non-binary name.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Its a shame the skin tight unitards mever caught on with the fellas. Thats a dapper suit right there.

[–] IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Beat sound to Nick’s blastin

Is that jerking off to gay porn?

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] ForestOrca@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

That would be molecules, I guess.

[–] tryplot@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

ah yes, the super futuristic and far off future of the year 2000

[–] Nepenthe@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Technically, the early 2050s. So there's still time.

[–] Resol@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why am I getting the vibe that these predictions will still be wrong?

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Have any of these predictions ever been right?

[–] tryplot@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I mean, if you want a list, here you go

[–] Resol@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Idk, probably.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why did we ever stop writing dumb puns on old cars?

Brb, keying "Racket Ship" onto mine really quick.

[–] fraksken@infosec.pub 21 points 1 year ago

lol. no cooking after burners

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Both of them appear to have broken their spines

Her foot appears to be pointing at the car, her knee to the right of the image, her torso front-right, and her head facing left

His legs look like he's just started to turn towards the car but his body is still going straight on to the right

[–] Rolando@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

It's because they were "cooking with super-atomic radiation".

[–] Cypher@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sir I would like to remind you that humans can twist themselves at the waist.

Though in fairness there’s no way to balance the way she is depicted.

[–] BaumGeist@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

I thought this was AI generated because of the terrible anatomy...

How does such a respected, experienced comic artist fuck up basic human forns this badly?

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

'Where are her organs?'

At home.

Future!

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

I bet her check engine light is on.