this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2021
13 points (63.3% liked)

Open Source

38642 readers
145 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 years ago (1 children)

Seems less about freedom and more about hero worship. Or is the bus factor for Free Software really that low?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 years ago (1 children)

in fact. This is the point where you confuse the movement with the person.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 children)

i think the Free Software movement is lost. regardless of the truth of these accusations, the supporters of the Free Software Movement are mindlessly defending RMS, who's just an irrelevant figurehead now. the Free Software Movement is looking less like a movement and more like a personality cult

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

I think Stallman's philosophy and writing are still very relevant, but I don't see the point in holding onto him as a cult figurehead. I don't necessarily think we need him around as a leader or a figurehead.

Even if he were a perfect individual, he won't be around forever. We need the movement to be able to outlive him.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 years ago

No one could possibly disagree with me, they are just afraid of being CaNcElLeD

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 years ago

Very explanatory.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 years ago

I don't like cancel-culture, either, but I also dislike hero-worship. If we are sometimes told to "hate the sin and not the sinner", isn't it equally as good to love the results of what a person accomplished but not the person?
I think I read his words were twisted, taken out of context anyway, though.