this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
15 points (94.1% liked)

cryptocurrency

2750 readers
8 users here now

The largest cryptocurrency community on the Fediverse!

Lemmy community dedicated to cryptocurrency news, technicals, education, memes and so more!

💬 Chat on Community Improvements and Development

Community Knowledge Base:

Be nice, have fun.

Community rules:

General lemmy.ml instance rules applicable here too.

Ugly brother of this community: bωockchain

For a community devoted to cryptography itself, visit c/cryptography

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

How will the value be affected when mining is over?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's anyone's guess. The hanging question to me had been where the horsepower to even maintain the ledger comes from when it's all mined.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I think transaction fees will be the driving factor (if so, fees will likely increase)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

You are correct on the initial model, and I wasn't really clear.

I think there's been a proliferation of the ledger beyond what the original design spec accounted for (exchanges) and it's going to require an amount of horsepower to move currency at an escalating level, while also scalping more on the moves of that currency.

It's easy to imagine a universe it's the large holders financing the machines to avoid total collapse and propping up the ledger. What's not is how parity comes to pass.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Hard to tell, the case with eth went pos and etc remained pow showed that miners are not so powerful as many suggested.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago
load more comments
view more: next ›