this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
227 points (95.6% liked)

politics

20416 readers
3761 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley, who is 90 years old, is being treated at a hospital in Iowa for an infection, his office announced Tuesday.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 94 points 1 year ago (2 children)

90 years old. Why do people keep voting for fossils?

I like Bernie Sanders and his views are younger than his age, but he's 82 now. He needs to pass the torch as well and endorse someone to replace him. He's done his service.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because anyone without 50 years of seniority won't have the pull to get those sweet, sweet, pork barrel projects.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Committee assignment is via seniority. So yes, they can add shit to bills, but they can also do so much more.

For assholes like Grassley, that equates to being able to do a lot of damage.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's some bullshit law if I ever saw one.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It’s supposed to keep assholes like the tea partyers or guys like Gates and Greene from getting control in committees until they’ve been there more than 1 term. it’s also why they offset congressional terms. So a state won’t likely end up with all its reps getting replaced at the same time.

I don’t support octogenarian+ politicians (even Bernie needs to pass the torch), but I do support rule makers having to learn how shit works before getting committee power to decide national security or health funding and decisions.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

He has the magic R next to his name (and because we're idiots)

[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The US forces military personel to retire as early as age 62, with officers being forced out at 64 unless they're a two star or higher, in which case POTUS can defer retirement until age 68. Yet you let your politicians and judges stay if they don't die? SMH... New rule proposal: if you are going to turn 70 in the next term, then you're not eligible for election. And judges are retired the month after their 70th birthday.

10 USC §1253 subsection a: "Unless retired or separated earlier, each regular commissioned officer of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps serving in a general or flag officer grade shall be retired on the first day of the month following the month in which the officer becomes 64 years of age."

Subsection b abridged: "[...] a grade above major general or rear admiral, the retirement under subsection (a) of that officer may be deferred [...] by the President, but such a deferment may not extend beyond the first day of the month following the month in which the officer becomes 68 years of age [...]"

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (4 children)

This is smart and would benefit American people

Therefore, it shall not be done.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Cue the people screaming “you can’t do that it’s ageist policy! What if they’re actually in good shape?”

Doesn’t matter. The ones in poor shape who refuse to give up the throne outweighs the few who somehow manage to stay relevant. It’s being out of touch with the 90% of the population below you in age, and that’s compounded by the bubble politicians live in already with their political games and maneuvering. All designed to keep themselves and their party in charge instead of actually giving a fuck about the country, willing to sacrifice their constituents for a corporate ~~bribe~~ campaign contribution.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

People would be fine doing this for those in the service while crying about personal liberties when it affects them. People wouldn't wear masks to preserve the life of your cancer-laden grandmother and they certainly won't retire early and give up their power.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

90 and still fucking people over. I certainly hope nothing goes bad for him while he's in the hospital...

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hope he gets the exact level of care he voted for in his career

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Let's face it, he'll get the best care available because the stuff he voted for/against doesn't really affect him.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm hoping for the best—one less Republican senator.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's not like any replacement has any hope of not being a Republican.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Ok, one less Republican, then.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

his replacement is literally his grandson

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Ah yes, have a revolution to get rid of the king, then set up your own hereditary political dynasties to rule over the land.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just leave you old fucks. Why do we keep electing geriatrics? It’s so fucking stupid.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Iowa just voted for Trump again. A whole lot of stupid up in there.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well it was the Republican caucus so there weren't exactly good options

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

True but Trump was probably the worst option and he dominated Iowa.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

Let's hope it's nothing innocous.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

A clear reference to how power could be addictive. True walking tombs still trying to stay in power

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can't wait for him to incoherently tweet about it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Republicans don’t usually xweet about untreated chlamydia

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don’t forget the thoughts. They go with the prayers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Karma, come and take him away already.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I SAID THOUGHTS AND PRAYERS!!

Yeesh what else ya want from us?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley, who is 90 years old, is being treated at a hospital in Iowa for an infection, his office announced Tuesday.

“Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) is receiving antibiotic infusions at an area hospital to treat an infection,” his office said in a brief statement.

“He is in good spirits and will return to work as soon as possible following doctors’ orders.”

Grassley’s absence comes just days before a deadline for a partial government shutdown.

Congressional leaders have agreed to a deal to keep the federal government funded into March, but both parties will need to supply votes to pass the legislation through both chambers before the Friday deadline.

The Senate is slated to take a procedural step to move the government funding resolution along later Tuesday night.


The original article contains 130 words, the summary contains 130 words. Saved 0%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Hypothetical question: If we Thanos snapped every government official over 75, how many would we lose? And in this alternate America, would you think it'll be better or worse?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Average age of the Senate is 64 and for the House is 57.

68 Senators are over 60. Pelosi was 83 when she quit the House.

As of August last year, 15 Senators were over 80. 4 Senators are over 80, 1 is 90+, (D) Dianne Feinstein but she passed on Sept. 29th.

Pelosi will seek another term in 2024 because fuck the younger generations.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Your periodic reminder that US Congress is the oldest legislative body in the world.

We need term limits, age limits, and competency tests, and we’ve needed them since at least the 1970s

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I'm hoping for a speedy resign NOW.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Sure would be sad if it were a fatal infection.Not.

load more comments
view more: next ›