this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2024
153 points (98.1% liked)

News

28572 readers
4909 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In more than 700 cases over five years, Georgia reported inadequate housing as the sole reason for taking a child into foster care, a WABE and ProPublica analysis found. Advocates say it would be cheaper to help families get housing.

...

In recent years, child welfare advocates and policymakers across the country have been working to prevent situations like this, arguing that no parent should ever lose their children just because they can’t afford housing. A handful of states now have laws and policies prohibiting government agencies from taking children into foster care because of homelessness. Georgia has not adopted such a rule, but the state Court of Appeals has ruled a number of times that unstable housing and employment “in no way constitutes intentional or unintentional misconduct resulting in abuse or neglect” that would justify child removals.

But Wise’s experience illustrates how an inability to afford housing still stands between parents and their children in many child welfare cases in Georgia.

Between fiscal years 2018 and 2022, DFCS reported “inadequate housing” as the sole reason for removing a child in more than 700 cases, according to an analysis by WABE and ProPublica.

The analysis, using data from the federal Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System, which tracks child removal cases in each state, also shows that in thousands of additional cases — about 20% of Georgia’s nearly 31,000 child removals during the five-year period — DFCS reported housing as one of multiple reasons. Housing was the third most reported reason after substance use and neglect.

all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ivanafterall@kbin.social 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Why do Republicans hate children so much? Is it because they're attracted to them, but can't have them or...?

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I don’t think they hate children per se, I think they just hate poor people. Gotta punish the poors for having the audacity to have children they can’t afford despite their criminalizing abortion!

[–] WaxiestSteam69@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's using the kids to punish the parents. Members of my wife's family claim to be Christians but support these types of policies and don't see the problem. I've had to check out when yhose discussions come up.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Who can forget that famous gospel where Jesus says “fuck them kids!”

I swear, supply side Jesus ruins everything.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago

And they don't think of children as people at all, just pawns they can use to hurt poor adults.

[–] trackcharlie@lemmynsfw.com 13 points 1 year ago

Nothing like moving children into an objectively abusive system than helping their families get back on their feet.

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

The cruelty is the point with the #fascist #GOP.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

In the 1920s, my grandmother's parents abandoned her with not especially close relatives who didn't care much for her in Schenectady, NY so they could go back to New York City. In the 1950s, my mother, my uncle and my grandparents were essentially homeless for a while. They lived on the enclosed porch of a friend who had a house in Queens. If they had lived in Georgia, and it had been today, I couldn't even imagine how my grandmother, abandoned by her own parents, would have reacted if my mother had been taken away from her.

They got their own home after a year and a half or so and my mother was in no way scarred by the experience. In fact, she liked it because the family inside the house had a television and she could watch it.