this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2024
131 points (97.8% liked)

PC Gaming

9253 readers
378 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bionicjoey 83 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Meanwhile Gamefreak: "we are but a small humble studio, you have to forgive the lack of polish in the last two gens of Pokémon games"

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Makes me wonder how much money they get from Pokemon as opposed to how much Nintendo gets from it.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well with all the bullshit layoffs there should be plenty of candidates

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's a good problem to have, isn't it? Your product got far more popular than you predicted that it would.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Sudden success has killed lots of businesses.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Not more than sudden failure though. :)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They sold at least 5.92m copies, which amounts to roughly usd177m revenue(roughly usd124.32m after steam cut), and with the playerbase tanked from 2.1m peak to 682k peak in just 14 days, they can survive for a veeery long time with that kind of money.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Usually that affects businesses that either provide an online service, so their costs spike massively, or are selling physical objects where demand so far outstrips supply that customers leave entirely for something else.

A single player / selfhksted multiplayer game like this is much less vulnerable to those aspects.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Usually that affects businesses that either provide an online service, so their costs spike massively

It was reported they were spending half a million USD a month on server costs. A lot of the servers are player-hosted but there are also official servers hosted by PocketPair. Half a million won't immediately crush them with their current sales numbers but it isn't great either.

Honestly no idea why they even have official servers.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That's a fair point.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

I’d be down but I require my own personal bucket of thumb drives