this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2024
298 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

63897 readers
5520 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

There's a great (and short) video about encryption back-doors by CGP Grey: "Should all locks have keys? Phones, Castles, Encryption, and You." (Piped link).

"No matter how much we might wish it, there's no way to build a digital lock that only angels can open and demons cannot. Anyone saying otherwise is either ignorant of the mathematics or less of an angel than they appear."

EDIT: I still hate you Piped bot.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

"Should all locks have keys? Phones, Castles, Encryption, and You."

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

It's ok PipedBot, I will always love you.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Even more generally than that, remember that daemons are fallen angels and that same thing happens outside the metaphorical world.

So even if the mathematics allowed it, once something is out and being use with backdoored encryption sooner or later the "bad guys" will have the means to use it if only because of human nature.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This article touches on three distinct issues. The first one is the misguided legislators who hope to get more accountability from tech companies (or to punish them) by creating encryption back-doors and restrictions. That part is worth reading and spreading, regardless of whether Signal is your tool of choice.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I certainly agree with a lot of that analysis. I also worry how signal continue to fund their app sustainably without compromising their users.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/824506840

Not a huge issue right now, but it will probably an issue in the future

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I donate monthly, and hope other privacy minded users consider doing it too

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Same here. I do $5 a month. Seems very doable for a lot of people.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago

And leggings