this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2024
613 points (89.1% liked)

Showerthoughts

32513 readers
2000 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Everytime I look at small problems or big global problems, if you follow the money trail, it all leads to some billionaire who is either working towards increasing their wealth or protecting their wealth from decreasing.

Everything from politics, climate change, workers rights, democratic government, technology, land rights, human rights can all be rendered down to people fighting another group of people who defend the rights of a billionaire to keep their wealth or to expand their control.

If humanity got rid of or outlawed the notion of any one individual owning far too much money than they could ever possibly spend in a lifetime, we could free up so much wealth and energy to do other things like save ourselves from climate change.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I've worked for a few small business tyrants that did horrible things as well. It's more of a system issue. Billionaires do the most damage of any individuals, but I think it would be pretty similar if CEOs made small amounts of money (the corporations themselves often lobby for their interests), or if there were only small businesses (they'd probably just form national organizations to lobby for their shared interests).

[–] ininewcrow 4 points 10 months ago

I agree with the idea of compensating someone who worked at managing an organization ... it takes work, talent, education and experience to do that and do it successfully.

What I don't believe is in rewarding leaders who led their organization, business or corporation into ruin while punishing those who worked under them.

The current system rewards and encourages bad immoral behaviour and we wonder why the system is bad and immoral.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Let’s say you get to pass a law in the USA that would make it illegal to have more than a billion dollars. How would you formulate this law and what would you expect to happen when it’s passed?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Anything over a net worth of 1 billion is taxed at 100%

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You'd probably format it as a percentage of GDP per capita, as it's about limiting wealth disparity (and thus protecting social mobility), distributing wealth growth nationally, and limiting the concentration of financial interest as it's a threat to national and democratic security.

You'd probably want it accompanies by various studies that show that that large wealth disparities are detrimental to social mobility (aka the ability to "work your way up" in classes), and probably some political science papers on the ills of concentrations of wealth.

You'd probably want it to come into force along with laws that limit campaign contributions and big money donors in politics... get rid of that whole "political donations are protected as political speech" crap.... and you'd probably want it as a wealth tax that pays into a sovereign wealth fund with rules on what it can be used for.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Its not the billionaires its that they are not paying back 50% to society.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

There is a truism. Will have to come back and give the original quotation author, but it's

"Only poor people pay taxes."

Rich people have the resources to evade and skirt around any tax legislation which they are supposed to be captured within. Most of them use the corporation as holders of wealth of which they have control.

Corporate taxes are almost always lower than personal taxes for that reason.

Banning billionaires is as likely to succeed as veganism.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›