this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2024
223 points (98.3% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2358 readers
1335 users here now

Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 134 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Can't afford a home, probably gonna be illegal to be homeless. Guess they should just kill themselves then.

Fuck the modern conservative movement. No empathy for the downtrodden.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 10 months ago (3 children)

It is illegal to kill yourself.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Born too early to enjoy fully automated luxury gay space communism, born too late to participate in affordable housing, born just in time to go to jail for conspiracy to commit suicide because living is too expensive.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Canada has entered the chat.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The next step is blending them into a nutrient-rich slush that will be fed to people in workhouses

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Too much pork fat to be healthy

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

That’s a very Soylent remark…

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

I don't think this is just about conservatives, it's also about the owner class and their quality of life. But def significant overlap.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/apr/16/us-homeless-encampments-companies-profiting-sweeps

Revealed: how companies made $100m clearing California homeless camps Public spending on private sweep contractors is soaring across the state – and unhoused people allege poor treatment

This reminds of the gross, despicable private detention and private prison industry in America.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

They're connected. How many times can you get detained overnight and have your entire life belongings destroyed before you fight the police officer detaining you?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 62 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Would these people rather homeless people break into places and sleeping inside? This seems like the only plausible alternative.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Of course they would. Homeless people aren’t criminals and they can’t make being homeless a crime, per se, so they just do as much as they can to drive them towards crimes. It’ll be safer to avoid being caught if they break in and can be hidden but if they do get caught it’ll be horrendous. They’ll put them in slave camps-I’m sorry, “jails” and away we go.

It is the most heinous shit imaginable and these broken monsters get off to it.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

I mean vagrancy is increasingly being criminalized directly.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 10 months ago

Watch closely as they make providing shelter illegal as well (just like they made providing food illegal). The cruelty is the point.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like a great idea.

Of course, if it's a crime to be homeless, it's also a crime to force or coerce someone into commiting that crime.

I look forward to the officials and landlords responsible to be jailed for each crime they helped commit.

[–] altasshet 7 points 10 months ago

"No, not like that!"

[–] [email protected] 38 points 10 months ago

That's right homeless, you can't sleep here. Just go home already.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I know this guy who goes to the New York state courthouse everyday to sleep. He doesn't even try to hide. He does it in an occupied court room during a trial, on tax-paid furniture.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

And the dude smells like SHIT.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

good, the judge deserves to smell some consequence.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 10 months ago (2 children)

As if we don't know how this Court will decide.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

I will say I'm somewhat optimistic about this case. Yes the current supreme court has a heavy partisan lean, but I've seen some decisions from the court which my pessimistic side didn't expect to go the way they did.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 10 months ago

"Let them sleep inside". paraphrasing Marie Antoinette. smh.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 10 months ago

Where do we put them if every city, every village, every town lacks compassion and passes a law identical to this

This is why there needs to be a national effort around this, rather than this patchwork approach which often just (expensively&wastefully) moves the problem around without solving it.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago

So, they won't help them and won't let them be on the streets? Man, homeless folks need to learn to levitate then, so they can sleep in the air instead.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago

How's that old quote go again? "The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread."

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This seems like a no-brainer to me... though it probably isn't. Obviously you have a constitutional right to sleep, wherever you can make space for yourself. If these cities and downs don't want people sleeping outside, they need to provide indoor space for people who haven't actually committed crimes. We treat our criminals better than we treat our homeless.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

fuck their laws, I think, is the ruling here. just fuck them completely. we do not have a society. your conscience is the only guide.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago

This is probably the most prescient episode of Star Trek ever: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Past_Tense_(Star_Trek%3A_Deep_Space_Nine)

Basically Sisko and friends go back in time to America in 2024, where it's illegal to be homeless and they get put in an open air prison.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Something something, sanctuary districts, something something, Bell Riots. Almost on schedule. WW3 next, then first contact.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

Unfortunately, due to a budget restriction, first contact has been canceled. Please accept our apology in the form of nuclear winter.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Belk Riots - September 2024

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Bell.

But yes this seems exactly like the precursor to the Bell Riots...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Had to look it up, Jesus that's a bit too on the nose.

Alright, I need to finally watch Star Trek through and through.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Enjoy, friend.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

They really love pushing buttons dont they

load more comments
view more: next ›