this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2022
31 points (100.0% liked)

Open Source

32619 readers
874 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

SourceHut is great. politically and ethically, it is the type of platforms (and code) we need for a resilient, decentralized, autonomous future! <3

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

The the central webUI would be key for major players adoption, and more time as well. It's been not long ago that debian, xorg, and arch (still in progress), migrated to gitlab, for example. Those migrations are expensive in people resources, and time.

And for regular individuals adoption, besides enabling the webUI, it might be way harder, unless someone contributes to sr.ht resources to allow hosting projects, with no CI support, but for free. It's hard to get individuals adoption at some cost, even if that's really a low cost, when there are alternatives, which BTW violate SW licenses, for free, :(

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Cool, I pay for sourcehut in order to get Gemini hosting and my shabby scripts hosted somewhere accessible. Nice to see a project like pmos consider Sourcehut.

Not a coder in any shape or form, just a hobbyist with sPeCiAl computer needs :)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How does SourceHut compare to Gitea instances?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Ahh my bad, I stopped reading at "Rollout plan".

Tldr: Gitea doesn't have CI/CD