Trigger Warning: Community contains mostly bad environmental news (not by choice!). Community may also feature stories about animal agriculture and/or meat. Until tagging is available, please be aware and click accordingly.

🪲

Aussie Zone Rules.

Golden rule - be nice. If you wouldn’t say it in front of your ~~grandmother~~ favourite tree, don’t post it.
No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. You are allowed to denigrate invasive plants or animals.
Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here. Except invasive plants or animals.
No porn. Except photos of plants. Definitely not animals.
No Ads / Spamming. Except for photos or stories about plants and animals.
Nothing illegal in Australia. Like invasive plants or animals. Exotic microbes and invasive fungi also not welcome.
Make post titles descriptive with no swear words. Comments are a free for all using the above rules as a guide. Fuck invasive plants and animals.

🐝

/c/Aussie Environment acknowledges the Traditional Owners of the land, sea and waters, of the area that we live and work on across Australia. We acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture and pay our respects to their Elders past and present.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

lodion@aussie.zone

Gorgritch_umie_killa@aussie.zone

105

Wind turbine energy claim is all spin and no power (www.aap.com.au)

submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by Treevan@aussie.zone to c/environment@aussie.zone

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Social media posts are full of hot air in claiming wind turbines take years of operation to make up for the energy needed to manufacture them.

"The turbine has to spin continually for over 4 years just to replace the energy it took to manufacture it. Most turbine blades last 3 to 7 years," it states.

Prof Cleveland co-authored a meta-analysis on the net energy return of wind power systems which found the energy return of investment, the ratio of energy delivered to energy costs, placed wind favourably in comparison to other technologies such as fossil fuels and nuclear.

"The average life of wind turbine blades is 18 to 25 years, with 20 years as a widely used industry standard," Prof Cleveland told AAP FactCheck.

The claim wind turbines take at least four years to recoup the energy used to create them is false. It typically takes about six months for turbines to recoup the energy costs of making them.

top 12 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Lintson@aussie.zone 34 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Social Media posts are full of hot air

End thread

[–] Treevan@aussie.zone 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

But my Mum says I'm cool.

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Not behind your back.

[–] Atlusb@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago (3 children)

This summary misses the most fun part of the article. They said it takes an average of only 6 months to pay back its energy cost of production!

[–] Treevan@aussie.zone 6 points 2 years ago

Ahh shit, I read the article and only skimmed the summary to make sure it made sense.

Do NOT believe the summary, people!

I'll edit it in. Thanks.

[–] hglman@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

18-20 years of free energy, nice !

[–] drzoidberg@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

But what about the thousands of bald eagles they kill?! Checkmate librul!

/s in case

[–] Treevan@aussie.zone 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Wedge-tailed Eagles here, mate. Checkmate, greenie!

In our country, the people who tend to vote conservative also kill the eagles:

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-09-24/man-poisoned-wedge-tailed-eagles-in-gippsland-jailed/10298426

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Conservatives should start a theater chain since they love projection so much.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The original claim makes no sense either as it would make the turbine economically unfeasible even with support from the government.

I get the bird and noise argument (though both are highly contested too) but the rest is gibberish as wind clearly makes surplus energy thus the profits.

[–] IncognitoWolf@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

I used to work on turbines, and I can attest the bird argument is very blown out of proportion. In my time working on turbines I never saw a single dead bird near the bases. We had a farm of Vestas V112-3.3mw turbines. Noise i can see, those blades whip through the air and cause almost the same sound as a distant jet as they whip by. Its not too loud unless winter then its very noticeable when the blades ice up. The hydraulics and such can be loud as well but its not terribly loud.

However the biggest thing I noticed was how not green they are when it comes to the lubricants. Its not uncommon to have the pitch cylinders leak, and fill the hub and spinner with oil. Lots of times the blade bearing grease would overfill the cups and throw grease in the spinner. Another thing is the hydraulic systems would leak and cause excessive oil spillage, which sometimes would make its way out into the world. We could only clean with rags and pig mats so its super oily and greasy everywhere. The cooling systems would also leak and usually spill many gallons of coolant out into the wind.

[–] bluGill@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

A couple years ago I calculated that it took about 10 hours of operation to make up for the oil in the gear box. I should have published that.