this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2024
38 points (91.3% liked)

Showerthoughts

30679 readers
383 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted, clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts: 1

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
    • If you feel strongly that you want politics back, please volunteer as a mod.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I realize I'm preaching to the choir a bit here, but I always thought about the economy as a bunch of objects and things that people are doing with them, but I just realized that actually, growth of the economy will always somehow impact the environment (not always necessarily to its detriment though). It really is a zero sum game and I was making a mistake of not always thinking about the two in concert.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I wouldn't call it zero sum. I think of zero sum as meaning more determent to the environment would always be more profitable. But in reality, some industries, like fossil fuels, agriculture, and mining have an outsized impact on the environment compared to things like software development, craftsmanship like watch making, and media.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's not just you, it's capitalism in general. The incentives without government intervention are entirely to plunder the natural resources to the maximum extent possible as quickly as possible, because without government intervention, they are all basically free, despite having massive value.

AKA The tragedy of the commons or economic externalities.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

The usual analysis is that the economy is a subset of the environment. In other words, the human economy is a (small, fragile, entirely dependent) part of the wider natural economy.

Unfortunately, orthodox economists have still not received the memo.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

From Greek roots, economics is resource management pertaining to a house or district. And isn’t the environment just humanity’s house? It would surely be a good thing to broaden traditional economics to include the externalities that companies dump into the environment.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Someone just read Blue Mars.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

This might apply to my country, I don’t think it applies to all though.