this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2025
182 points (98.9% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5603 readers
722 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 73 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Did someone forget to pay the bribes?!!

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Nah, more like "we already heard your arguments at the golf club. No reason to listen again, we're already going to rule in your favor."

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago

That's not how this works and a golf club isn't a court. This means the lawsuit can proceed. If they had already decided to rule in O&G's favor on this, they would have done so by hearing the case and making a ruling in their favor.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago

This means they're declining to have the case brought forward before the Supreme Court, effectively ruling against the petro companies. It's really quite a surprising turn of events.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Nah, they have a less obvious lawsuit in the works that will get little coverage. Business as usual.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Mate these ghouls literally rolled back Roe v Wade right in front of the world's face. I don't think they care what we think or how much coverage they get. They are immune to the consequences of their actions and thus will continue to act this way.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, but no.

It's all about smoke and mirrors with corporate malfeasance - to be fair the oil companies can also just do what they want the fines would always be just another line item in the P&L, but they spend the money on PR anyway.

What I am talking about is how they will undermine any law or get it how they want to maximize profit without anyone looking too deeply.

If that was not the case the SC would hear this case and follow through, absorbing the backlash like they got from the Roe v Wade.... it's still all about image for corporate America.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

maaaaybe they're not happy with the paltry pizza parties anymore

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago

The California fires have spooked the rich after seeing so many mansions burning from near hurricane force winds pushing fire like it was flood waters. Nothing will be saved. We will soon own nothing and be happy.