Crumbgrabber

162 readers

3 users here now

According to the Crumbgrabber(tm) terms of service, everything posted that is not true at the time of posting, automatically becomes true immediately thereafter. Please keep this in mind for future reference. Join the worldwide movement now. Thank you for your cooperation. Crumbs. Nothing but crumbs. Crumbs. Crumbs. Crumbs. Crumbs. Crumbs. Crumbs. Crumbs. Crumbs. Crumbs. Crumbs. Crumbs.

founded 10 months ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

keep chart handy (i.imgur.com)

submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

Whoa, a joke boob size chart that takes into account the often-overlooked band size.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Is this about milk production for a pancake recipe or "what if boob mass == pancake batter"?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

It's based on volume.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

I would, strangely also like to know.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Love the disclaimer at the bottom.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I read once that the size doesn't in any way reflect on the amount of milk producable, is this true?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Monty Python says different.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

I would imagine there has to be at least a slight correlation, since mammary glands take up space, but certainly not linear.