this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2025
271 points (98.2% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

36185 readers
1156 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The per 100g price makes it seem like the 1kg (bottom) item is cheaper than the 2kg one.

I wonder how many people are baited into getting the more expensive item (by weight).

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 87 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

the per 100g price on the bottom is incorrect. they are 70 cents per 100g... or I'm too high. choosing by weight is literally the frugal method.

edit: try living out of a vending machine - if you only have a dollar, you should buy the item with most weight and presumably most calories

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Surprise, the heaviest $1 item was a 1500 g bottle of still water...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well the second heaviest then

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

There bottom one is 60 cents per 100 g. Top left it says 2 for 12$. It may be that the weight didn't register correctly, as it says '1' instead of '1kg' or because some other conflict.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 week ago (3 children)

What happened there? These are presumably calculated automatically, so does the second item has its mass listed as 2kg?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

What happened? We live in corporate dictatorships where oligarchs can false advertise, price gouge, kick your dog, and fuck your wife... and your only recourse is a class action lawsuit where you make a few bucks after a decade.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Damn, I didn't know things were so bad there in Canada.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

The same dystopian enshittification is going on pretty much everywhere, you just aren't aware of it yet.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’ve been noticing bad math in the Uber driver app lately.

There have been a few times it tells me my ETA is 12 minutes but I’m 16 miles away. Like I know it doesn’t think I’m gonna be doing these residential streets at 90 mph

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

Afaik that's deliberate to force the driver to get to the destination asap at all costs, but also to lie to the customer that their ride is just a few minutes away so there's no need to cancel or look for alternatives.

[–] Showroom7561 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] VieuxQueb 5 points 1 week ago

Price per 100g should not change.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Second is scam by 2 for 12$ but 35c(lol?) per 100g. = 3,50 per 1kg = 7 for 2kg.. So 6.97 for 1 kg by 35ct per 100g. Wtf?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Even in the detailed info? If so that's weird; probably something along the lines of "the seller messed up the weight, fixed it, but for some insane reason the site doesn't recalculate the price".

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

My guess is that there's some funky spaghetti code that's using the promo, which is for 2 kg, as the weight of the product on the calculations.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Only if it is a 2 pack of 1kg containers. I know costco does that often so I imagine walmart might too. (And if that 2-for-12 runs you a total of 4 kg.)

[–] Showroom7561 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Top one is 2kg (single unit) and the bottom is sold as a 1 kg single unit, or 2 / $12 (2 x 1kg), which is STILL not a better value than the top one! LOL

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That's why I stopped shopping by listed price a long time ago. My punk ass was poor, as in below poverty line several times while still working. Had to learn that lesson quick lol.

Once I learned that the per weight pricing was a more useful metric, I carried a calculator any time I shopped. Ain't no reason to pay more for products that are functionally the same.

Now, I'm not saying that any given brand is worth the savings per weight. Some store brands suck, and do so hard enough that even though they cost less, they're a waste. The products do need to be in line with needs as a primary factor.

Peanut butter in specific, there's a chain here that it is so thick and gritty, you'd think it was a stripper. You take a taste and the only way you'd want it again is if it were twerking on a pole. So, even though name brands cost more, if it comes down to having to eat that crap or do without, I'm doing without.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The issue here is that the per weight pricing listed is half of what it should be.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Ahhh, gotcha. It wasn't evident without paying attention more than I would have considered necessary given the title. Thanks for the correction

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

I love thinking about peanut butter being a stripper, thank you.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I have to admit, it took me a while to realize the bottom one was only 1kg. And all the numbers would "confirm" that they are both 2kg

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

It took me a while also. It all make sense if the price by weight is calculated when 2 are bought. Also, a comment about 4kg need not be.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How are you going to pass on one called great value? Would be like buying something that doesn't have the word best in it when another product does. I'm not dumb.

[–] Showroom7561 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not sure if you're Canadian, but we have a brand called "President's Choice"... oh god.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

As an American the last thing I’d ever be buying is something that’s “presidents choice”

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

“Great value” is like “all natural:” a totally meaningless phrase that signals nothing except that someone’s selling you something.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Great value is like "kraft". It's the brand name. The store brand in this case.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Yep I can see that. I just find it fatuous.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (5 children)

The great value peanut butter has a weird taste, in my opinion. it's worth a few bucks more to get something that tastes better.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

But that's no excuse for the wrong per 100g price listed, is it?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Rule #1: Never buy great value.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

always. practicing basic division is also good brain excersise.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Over here, peanut butter is an EXTREMELY costly delicacy. To have a store sell it in 2kg portions for less than 10usd looks like a dream to me.

You people need to better appreciate what you have

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It's great value peanut butter. It is easier to clarify that as a semi solid oil than actual peanut butter. Feel free to be jealous but that's not 'good' peanut butter. It's better than nothing but only just.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Especially in a physical store, I see it all too often

load more comments
view more: next ›