this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2025
138 points (99.3% liked)

politics

19830 readers
3933 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump revoked Biden’s executive order that affirmed the inclusion of all residents in census results, regardless of immigration status.

This action clears the path for potential changes in how the 2030 census will be conducted, including the possibility of excluding non-citizens from apportionment counts.

The Supreme Court has yet to rule on the constitutionality of such exclusions.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 49 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

This one isn't worth anyone's time worrying about right now, except for the proper advocacy groups who will challenge it right away, where it might get to the Supreme Court during this Presidential term, or might not. He tried to pull this when he was in charge of the last Census, and was blocked in the courts. Which means it can be challenged right up to the point where they formalize the questions a few months beforehand, so whatever he decides now can be changed by the next President.

For those of you who are about to post "We can't even be sure he will leave office when the Constitution says he will", you're right, of course. But if that happens the Census will be so low on the list of how we are fucked up that it will end up being a footnote, so it's not worth worrying about in either case.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

One thing missing here, and it's the same bullshit they tried during his first term. The "Special Census" they tried to pull to impact the 2020 census. They essentially want to try and give power to state and local governments to not adhere to US Census data in order to only count people they choose. One portion of that plan detailed here: https://publicintegrity.org/politics/system-failure/trump-obstruction-of-2020-census/

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago

You are absolutely correct, but I stand by my statement that Trump can't really do much to affect that now, particularly through executive actions that the next President can always revoke. Even if his pet Congress passes laws that have more staying power, passing them now gives advocacy groups plenty of time to challenge them. It's simply too early to make changes that will stick.

It will be the job of whoever is President in 2029/2030 to set up that Census. If that person is a MAGA Republican, with a fully Republican Congress backing him (you know it will be a man, don't you?), then the Census will be fucked. But there will be so much else fucked that hardly anyone will notice the Census being so.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

oh look. another reason people should have taken that last opportunity to make a difference with their vote.