this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2025
54 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

1972 readers
361 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @[email protected].

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Social media giant Meta has offered to pay up to $5,000 (£4,040) to popular creators in the United States who join Facebook and Instagram.

It says those joining from "third-party social apps" will get cash based on "an evaluation of your social presence".

Though it does not mention TikTok by name, the timing would suggest Meta is attempting to capitalise on the uncertainty surrounding its rival, as questions swirl about whether President Trump can find a way of preserving it for US users

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Iirc Meta, X and some other platform I can't think of did a similar thing with popular streamers and YouTubers trying to get them to post to their platforms. Most of them told Meta and X to screw off.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Meta treats their influencers like shit, they are wise to avoid them.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I saw a tiktoker who shares recipes say she got under $1 from instagram for November or December with just shy of 200k followers, and $3700 from TikTok for the same month, however there she has 400k+ followers. I cannot imagine that having the other 200k followers would equate to an extra $3699.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yea I can't logically understand how an influencer even gets their content seen on Meta's platforms given how it's algorithm just pukes random shit at you 24/7 with no rhyme or reason.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's so strange. When they released reels it was really bad. It just kept force feeding me altright bs and conspiracy theories. Then one day it fed me exactly what I wanted to see and it was like a whole day of just interesting informative content every time I pop back to it I thought oh that's kind of nice having alternatives is good.

And then it would just flip back and forth randomly. On a given day I'd either get nothing I wanted to see or I would get a bunch of great content.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Yea id either get what I wanted to see which was essentially just shit posting and wood working videos or, more usually the case, it would be nothing but Ben Shapiro, Joe Rogan and half baked conspiracy videos taking about DEW and wildfires.