It takes a certain number of votes to begin impeachment proceeding. There are currently not enough decent Representatives in the House to pass such a vote.
this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2025
57 points (91.3% liked)
No Stupid Questions
36682 readers
2058 users here now
No such thing. Ask away!
!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules (interactive)
Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.
All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.
Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.
If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.
Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.
If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.
Credits
Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!
The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
One major thing holding the Democrats back from this is that the Democrats still haven't had it beaten into their skulls that the rules of politics are dead, dead, dead. They still seem to think that decorum matters and that if they just sigh and accept the Republicans' actions now they'll eventually get their turn later.
See also: Tea time prior to the Trump's inauguration. The cognitive dissonance between preemptively pardoning your loved ones and having tea with the potential perpetrator is goddamn insane.
Though as I'm typing this I see that maybe Biden was sucking up to his new overlord? Maybe both actions were aimed at keeping his family safe in any upcoming purge.
Impeachment must start in the House, and the rules of the House are heavily tilted toward majority rule. So it would need a majority vote to even get started, and it would be referred to a committee with a Republican majority. If, somehow, the investigation done there is fair and a recommendation to impeach passes the committee, it still needs to pass in the House again.
But then, it goes to the Senate, where a 2/3 majority (67/100) is required to convicted. So now we have gone from needing a handful of Republican defectors on the House (including at least one committee member) to needing 20 of 53 Republican Senators to agree to convict. That is an extremely high bar. If you were a Republican House member who is on the fence about Trump, it is simply not worth openly defying him unless you were certain Republican Senators would convict. Particularly after Trump just pardoned a bunch of folks who have already stormed the Capitol once.
it would need a majority vote to even get started
Which seems to imply that the absolute first step is for there to be a vote.
So I think OP's question is really- "Even though it's not going to go anywhere, why can't democrats just keep asking for that initial vote for different chargers to clog up the house?"
My guess is that they could do that, but eventually doing so would be called out as pointless time wasting and be disallowed.
I can see a directive going out that any participants are to be barred from participating in anything at all. Even if there's some legislative rule that says they can't be, because we all know how the new administration feels about old legislation. And then actual, literal guards will be brought in to keep those people out.
And maybe all others in the same political party "just in case they decide to try the same thing".
TBH, the Trumpists are probably looking for any excuse to do just that.
The Speaker of House wields a lot of power, including deciding what gets brought up to vote in the House.
The current speaker is not a Democrat.
Holding presidents accountable kicked the dodo as soon as Gerald Ford pardoned Nixon. If you hold one accountable, then the precedent is that you have to hold them all accountable. The list of war crimes and domestic use of violent force to curb peaceful protest from US presidents on both sides of the aisle would have to be interrogated for one. Neither party wants that.
FWIW, impeachable offenses from the POTUS go back a lot further than Nixon. More serious, too. But yes, Nixon/Ford showed us the process doesn't work.
If they do it twice, its because trump is doing something bad.
If they do it 50 times, people across the political spectrum will see it as political persecution (especially right-wingers).
Once is persecution if it happens to us, 50 times is just our job if it's a Clinton
I mean everyone does not have the floor all the time and the speaker has a lot of control over that. Im sure there are procedures and such but there is the whole maturity thing. Republicans are pretty good at not getting work done and believe it or not there are some regular congressional things that need to get done or its bad for the country (us/everyone) also the less congress does things the more it falls on the president to do whats required.
Because Dems are complicit in his actions, they only opposed him in rhetoric, in action they back him