this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
75 points (98.7% liked)

Texas

1518 readers
2 users here now

A community for news, current events, and overall topics regarding the state of Texas

Other Texas/US Lemmy Communties to follow

Sports

BYPASSING PAYWALLS

Rules (Subject to Change)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/36009271

Texas Land Commissioner Dawn Buckingham said a facility built on this farmland recently bought by Texas will be the final stop for processing migrants before deportation.

She also promised more Texas land for mass deportation: “The new project that the General Land Office is going to bargain that I have created is the Jocelyn Initiative, in which we will locate appropriate land under my jurisdiction to lease for the construction of violent criminal deportation facilities.”

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

An so they started setting up their very own Concentration Camps. How long will it take for the gas chambers to follow?

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Everything is bigger in Texas, even the concentration camps.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Have no doubt they'll use the thirteenth amendment to use them as slaves.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

They won't. It will defeat their case if they do:

Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

They are arguing that immigrants are not "subject to the laws of the United States", which basically means they can be treated as enemy combatants or POWs.

But they can't be prosecuted for crimes, let alone convicted.

It doesn't seem that Dawn Buckingham got the memo, but these facilities can't be for "violent criminal deportation", as "violent criminals" are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.

These facilities have to be for "repatriating captured enemy combatants to their nation of origin".

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Conviction is the easy part.

No they'll argue they're subject to the laws but not the protection under law as there's already precedent for that. I think people forgot how industrialized we've made racism, this is just making back on ole reliable.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

14th amendment:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

If they make the argument you just made, they kill their argument against birthright citizenship.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Jurisdiction can mean power over it doesn't actually imply protection from, we have other amendments for that. They'll argue some limited wording in the constitution and the 4th, 13th, and 14th amendments allows for illegals to not fall under the umbrella of constitutional protections.

It's a bad argument sure, but they don't generally have good arguments they just have 98% of government under their control and a rabid fan base. While it shouldn't be a winning argument it probably will be in this regime.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago

Fuck this Nazi cunt.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

It's too bad that land couldn't possibly be used for anything else

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

🎵 Garbage humans, garbage humans, garbage all around 🎵