this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2025
5 points (64.7% liked)

Overseas News

532 readers
14 users here now

A place for Australians and friends to share news from the other countries. Like all communities here, we discuss topics from the Australian perspective.

If you're looking for a global /c/worldnews instead, search for the many options on federated instances.

Rules
  1. Follow the aussie.zone rules
  2. We are not a generic World News clone. News must be relevant to Australians and our region. Obvious disregard will earn an warning and then a ban if continued. (If an article isn't from an Oceanian news outlet, and it doesn’t mention Australia, then it’s probably off-topic)
  3. Leave seppocentrism at the door. If you don't know what that means, you're not ready to post here yet.
  4. Avoid editorialising headlines. Opinions go in the comments, not the post.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Ahh kowtowing to the orange fascist. Exactly what i expected from the goog.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

WHAT THE FUCK MAN? SURE! LETS CALL IT PLANET AMERICA! THIS IS FUCKING STUPID.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

So their announcement seems to be saying they'll follow what the national government officially calls the feature:

In an X post on Monday, Google said its Maps service would reflect the change once it is officially updated in the US Geographic Names System. The change will be visible to Google Maps users in the US, but it will remain listed as Gulf of Mexico for those accessing the platform from Mexico. Outside of the two countries, users will see both names.

And, yeah. What is the alternative policy from Google that we're proposing? That Google should be sovereign in itself, declare they'll name it whatever seems right to Google, and not defer to the government appointed names for things? Based on what, exactly?

I want Google subject to official government policy, and not to ignore it. I want Google Maps to follow the official name when, for example, Ayer's Rock is now officially called Uluru.

This specific government policy (that the Gulf of Mexico be changed to the "Gulf of America") is stupid and jingoistic. But is the answer to that, we want corporations empowered to ignore government policy?

If the government of the day orders that Uluru is now called "Aussie Stone", and Google announces they'll update maps to follow the change of official name? My objection is not that Google follows the official name; it's that the government of the day is wrong and needs to be ousted.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Yeah I sorta agree. I think following government policy rather than making their own decision is a good way to avoid them being responsible for any really bad political blunders.

But at the same time, yeah, it would be kinda nice if they could take a stand. Not on any seriously complicated issues like Kashmir, but when it's just a jingoistic fascist doing jingoistic nationalism? Yeah, it'd be good if they put their foot down and said "no, that's BS, and we're not going to enable it". For the same reason I don't like Facebook hiding behind "it's free speech" when excusing the (entirely technically legal) hate speech they allow on their platform.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Could google just have different names depending on the country of origin?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

They will. Gulf of America in America. Gulf of Mexico in Mexico. They'll display both names to the rest of us, according to the article.

Imo that last part is the biggest BS. If they wanna show Americans the name given to it by the morons they elected, so be it. But the rest of us shouldn't have to put up with that nonsense.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I think they've done this in the past with things like the border between India and Pakistan being different depending on what country you're looking at it from

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Ok I'm starting to think Trump and Amerigo Vespucci are related. Too much named after them.