this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
184 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19830 readers
5788 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

An influential Silicon Valley publication runs a cover story lamenting the “pussification” of tech. A major tech CEO lambasts a Black civil rights leader’s calls for diversifying the tech workforce. Technologists rage against the “PC police”.

No, this isn’t Silicon Valley in the age of Maga. It’s the tech industry of the 1990s, when observers first raised concerns about the rightwing bend of Silicon Valley and the potential for “technofascism”. Despite the industry’s (often undeserved) reputation for liberalism, its reactionary foundations were baked in almost from the beginning. As Silicon Valley enters a second Trump administration, the gendered roots of its original reactionary movement offer insight into today’s rightward turn.

...

This rising “technofascism”, as critics of the time had called it, was temporarily staved off by the dotcom stock market crash of 2000. George Gilder’s reputation was badly damaged after he failed to predict the crash. And much of the hype around digital tech was temporarily tempered after hundreds of startups went bust. But a younger generation of aspiring tech hopefuls had already come to the valley, seeking fame, riches, and power. Elon Musk, Peter Thiel and others had absorbed the lessons of the 90s. At the start of the new millennium, they were ready to put their stamp on the future, guided by reactionary dreams of the past.

The Silicon Valley titans of 2025 are following the same blueprint. Last week, Mark Zuckerberg announced that Meta was ending its DEI programs and changing its platform policies to allow more discriminatory and harassing posts. On Joe Rogan’s podcast, Zuckerberg made his motivations clear: he claimed that corporate culture had moved away from “masculine energy” and needed to reinstate it after getting “neutered”. Elon Musk has reshaped Twitter into X, a platform in large part operating as a response to claims of a “woke mind virus”– the newest iteration of “political correctness”. And Marc Andreessen himself, the “boy genius” of the 1990s, has increasingly drawn inspiration from the Italian futurists, a movement of fascist artists in the early 20th century who glorified technology while seeking to “demolish” feminism.

But the history of the valley suggests this isn’t a blip or an anomaly. It’s a crescendo of forces central to the tech industry, and the current wave of rightwing tech titans are building on Silicon Valley’s foundations.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

https://knowyourmeme.com/editorials/guides/what-is-tpot-on-twitter-grey-tribe-twitter-and-its-connection-to-suspected-uhc-shooter-luigi-mangione-explained

This goes back to the Crypto Markets of the pre-COVID era and the libertarian dream of an entirely privatized form of techno-segregation. Peter Thiel's vision for the future involves a fully automated apartheid regime the likes of which even Israel has yet to achieve. Guys like Zuck and Musk are ultimately just along for the ride.

The most recent news-media engineered screaming fit over DEI is just one more assault on the liberal barricades, as these parasites infiltrate the upper echalons of the bureaucratic world and weed out anyone who isn't fully pilled on a techno-feudal white supremacy.

One side-effect of the movement is guys like Luigi who come out of the cult-like social atmosphere with very revolutionary ideas for change rooted in very reactionary understandings of the status quo. Killing Brian Thompson as an act of Longtermism touched a libidinal urge within the public at-large to throw down the scholoratic old dynasty of corrupt administrators. But it came out of Luigi's time basting in an ideology that venerated strict hierarchies only to convince himself that the wrong people were in charge.

Jokes aside

https://www.dailygrail.com/2024/10/the-technocratic-conspiracy-how-tech-tycoons-plan-to-disrupt-democracy-and-become-the-new-rulers-of-the-world/

This is serious shit.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Behind the bastards host Rober Evans does a great job of outlining how this is happening in his book, "The War on Everyone." It's available for free all over the Internet (Including SoundCloud).

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

I'm more of a TrashFuture and TrueAnon head because I can't stand ads.

TrueAnon's The Blue Light Killer takes a deep dive into Mangione's political beliefs. I know TrashFuture has a bunch on Thiel's TPOT/Grey Tribe bullshit, but I'll be damned if I can find it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

People should also read about Curtis Yarvin while they’re at it.

[–] masterofn001 3 points 1 week ago

The article they linked goes into great detail about him and really, truly, ties all these ends together.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Just finished the article. It was a great read and I appreciate you sharing it.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

While it most likely started way before, the sale of Twitter was the turning point. Twitter was (albeit is NeoNazis allowed to flourish under Jack's ownership for engagement) the digital public square, much moreso than Facebook, or anything else that had come before, in that Politicians, Entertainment figures, World leaders, News orginizations, Federal and State agencies the world over, joined regular joe schmoe internet user, in releasing pertinent up to date information, new, and engaged in conversation. It was a miracle. It was babel before the fall.

Twitter was bought by Musk at the behest of Saudi royals who never again wanted to be raked over the coals globally for doing something like butchering Kashoggi, the blowback cost them face which they were not prepared for spending billions on things like soccer leagues and stadium to curry favor with the west, and Elon wanted Saudi markets open for his rocket ships and electric cars, they invested, he invested, but mostly he took out loans from sucker banks which had made money from Tesla and Space x. I don't think he intended to become the nazi poster child when he bought twitter, but water finds it's own level, and this was always his. Musk has used his position as owner of SpaceX, Tesla, and Twitter to sway the US election, and install himself at the very highest level of actual government.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Can’t believe they didn’t mention Yarvin as inspiration for these shitheads.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curtis_Yarvin

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

And Nick Land, as well as the wider Dark Enlightenment.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Peter Thiel

I think Thiel is the most "interlectual" and long term thinking of Trumps supporters. And he openly supported Trump since 2016, when Elon was still waiting & hiding. But somehow he gets less attention than Elon, I think this is his strategy to talk in the universities and not the MAGA directly.