this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2025
13 points (100.0% liked)

Anti-Corporate Movement

507 readers
239 users here now

This community is the first one on lemmy of its kind. It sits between the idea of anarchism/anti-capitalism and left leaning economic policy.

Our goal is to make people aware of the dangers of corporate control, its influence on governments and people as well as the small but steady abrasion of empathy around the world indirectly caused by it.

Current topics this includes but is not limited to:

Feel free to debate this but beware, corporate rhetoric is not welcome here. If you have arguments, bring them on. If its rhetoric trying to defend the evil actions of corporations, we will know and you will go.

Our declared goal so far is to have all companies and individuals worldwide capped at 999 mil USD in all assets, including ownership of other companies, sister companies and marital assets. The reason for this is that companies (and individuals) are not supposed to resemble small(?) countries with a single leader(-board) and shareholder primacy. Thats why we feel like they must be kept in check indefinitely.

But companies will just wander off The argument that large companies will just wander off is valid, which we embrace. We dont need microsoft, apple, google, amazon and other trillion dollar companies. There are small competitors being kept small and driven into brankruptcy by anti competitive behavior of these giants or simply bought up and closed. If starbucks left tomorrow, we would not have an issue with this.

But then we have x little microsofts that all belong to the same person(s) If in fact nobody was allowed to accumulate more than 999 mil in assets, they would not be able to own all these. And like defending agains burglary, it is not about complete defence but time and effort. You only have to keep the thief occupied long enough for them to be caught, give up or make a mistake.

But these giants have tons of IP which would then limit our growth Thats another topic we must touch on. We will (only this one time) take a page out of russias playbook and demand that IP of non complying companies (assets over 999 mil USD) will be declared invalid, which opens them up to be copied.

But then they will "live" in one country that doesnt accept this Correct, and they should be taken into custody the moment they enter the airspace of a country that supports this act.

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/25371299

About 20 days ago, I had made a blog post about an idea I had for a better federated search engine model.

It didn't take much time for it to develop into a thing I am fixated on.

I am putting the code out, its not ready or working, but it is something I am really happy to make and has filled my time with joy designing.


My current plan is the following:

  1. Get the basic web-ring creation process down
  2. Get scraping jobs functional
  3. Provide a basic query system
  4. Implement basic user accounts
  5. Implement basic federation
  6. Implement basic moderation

Once I am done with the core features that I have in mind, I will start working on adding more features and quality of life improvements.


Some features I want to work on to make this software more enticing to administrators:

  1. The ability to customize what is publicly accessible.
  2. The ability to edit the pages HTML style on the fly, without having to recompile.
  3. Containers for easy deployment.

In regards to application design, I am taking pages from my book in developing Android applications, along with cherry-picking from projects @[email protected] made.

  1. MVC design, with static pages to provide the fastest loading experience for users
  2. Bootstrap to make the pages responsive for any device
  3. Diesel to abstract database interaction and migration.
  4. Handlebars for view templating
  5. Axum as the HTTP core

Hopefully these design decisions make my application as debt free as possible.


If you have any advice or suggestion, please do give, I want to know how I can do better or avoid common pitfalls for newcomers!

If you have criticisms, please be constructive and have empathy towards the fact of me doing this because it makes me happy.

top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

What is your search scope here? I'm not clear on that at a glance, as a non dev user of the fediverse.

As an American, personally, I wish we could start calling it community-ist when it is not overtly political. I have no problems with diverse political ideologies. In English in the USA there is a lot of dogma attached to the words communist and socialist that fails to resonate with otherwise moderately intelligent people. "Community-ist" absolutely forces an English speaker to say they are anti-community to oppose it and therefore implies they need to rethink socialism and communism to some extent helping to reverse dogma.

Anyways, good luck with the project.