this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2025
27 points (93.5% liked)

UK Politics

3256 readers
205 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And now, analysis of NHS statistics has shown that people in poorer areas – who already have fewer doctors per thousand residents anyway – are the ones bearing the much greater brunt of the replacement of what ‘doctors’ they do have by non-doctor ‘associates’. James Steen, head of the British Medical Association (BMA) in London, has published charts showing the statistics for access to ‘clinical’ staff by wealth and the percentage of ‘associates’ – and finds that the poor have less access and among those they can access, the percentage of associates without medical training is far higher

These graphs are actually from here, and the analysis was done by Madeline Sherratt and Jaimie Kaffash. Very shoddy on Skwawkbox's part given how easily I has able to find them.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To be fair, you would assume the head of the BMA of all people would know to cite his sources.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

True, he should've linked to where he got them.