A community for news and discussion about the hardware side of technology.
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @[email protected].
MRAM prototype is claimed to deliver a 50 percent reduction in overall energy usage over current equivalent devices, a 30 percent boost in efficiency, and a 20 percent reduction in the current required to store data by flipping its magnetic bits
Too much mixing of units for me to interpret.
Is the 50% overall reduction supposed to be the sum of 30% efficiency plus the 20% bit-flip cost?
Wonder how compares to Everspin’s MRAM. just from reading the home page and your article, they focus version is marketing the persistent memory without power aspect for satellites and the article is geared towards energy efficiency for ai.