this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2025
122 points (99.2% liked)

politics

20014 readers
4011 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Quoted from article:

[…] all our activities have come to an abrupt halt in the past few days. Last Thursday, the Senate confirmed Russell Vought—an avowed Christian nationalist and architect of Project 2025—to be head of the Office of Management and Budget. Within a day, Donald Trump appointed him to simultaneously be the acting director of the CFPB. As this was unfolding, the administration permitted billionaire Elon Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency underlings to enter the CFPB headquarters, where they reportedly accessed internal systems including personnel rolls and financial records. Musk, it’s worth remembering, has previously said he wanted to “delete CFPB,” which is the regulator that would have oversight of his reported plans to turn X into a digital wallet app.

Since the DOGE takeover, and in the past 72 hours, Vought and Musk have worked hand in hand and with unnerving speed to strip the CFPB for parts and bring its work to a screeching halt. On Saturday night, Vought sent an email to all CFPB employees, building on guidance that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent issued during his four-day tenure as acting director of the CFPB earlier in the week. Vought directed all CFPB employees to immediately cease issuing rules or guidance, suspend all effective dates of all final rules that have not yet come into effect, not open new investigations, stop all supervision activities, halt enforcement actions, and not issue public communications of any type. Soon afterward, Vought posted on X to proclaim that he would not be requesting the next draw of CFPB’s funding from the Federal Reserve, effectively eliminating CFPB’s customary budget. On Sunday afternoon, CFPB employees were informed by email that headquarters would be closed for the week but that “employees and contractors are to work remotely.”

Despite these unnerving developments, my colleagues and I remained committed to doing our jobs. So it came as a shock when, a few minutes after we logged on to telework on Monday morning, we received yet another directive from Vought, now repeatedly ordering all employees to “not perform any work tasks” and to “stand down from performing any work task.”

As a result, the CFPB now stands as an ineffective watchdog—chained, muzzled, and left to starve in its kennel so that it can no longer guard the public. This is profoundly sad for the employees like me who have worked zealously to protect the American public from frauds and scams, day in and day out. Now, nobody is allowed to respond to consumer complaints that come in, let alone investigate them. This has all been extremely frustrating, confusing, and shocking.  My colleagues and I are complying with the fiat handed down by Vought while trying to wrap our heads around these unprecedented actions happening in real time.  But we’d really rather just get back to the work we are so proud of doing.

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 days ago (3 children)

My colleagues and I are complying with the fiat handed down by Vought while trying to wrap our heads around these unprecedented actions happening in real time. But we’d really rather just get back to the work we are so proud of doing.

But what is most upsetting is that this is all blatantly illegal.

What the author needs to understand is that their job is now to fucking stop complying! If they actually care as much as they say they do, they need to ignore the illegal orders, work anyway, and literally fistfight anybody who tries to stop them. That's where we're at now.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago

It's easy to say, but the author and his colleagues are not in a position to just "stop complying".

  1. We don't know the author's exact work. It could just be administrative or something that wound not make sense to be worked on if they aren't delivering anything.

  2. I'm not sure what work you expect then to do if their bosses are complying. If they are expected to be watch dogs, but the part of the organization that enforces the rules simply won't enforce them, then what do you want to be done? Send stern warnings to rule breakers knowing it's pointless?

It's a shitty situation that needs to be solved elsewhere.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Honestly, I think the author did the most important task of all -- exposing this to daylight. Let's face it. For at least the next 2 years, and probably for the next 4, and maybe even beyond, this is what the government is going to do. Unless and until we can replace Republicans with Democrats and take back control of the country, this is what we're getting. This is what 77mln people voted for. This is what 90+mln people voted for by not voting. And 2mln people voted third party, which was also a vote for this indirectly. And Trump does have the right to implement the agenda he was elected on, of course, within the guidelines of the laws.

I suspect there's illegality here. But it has to be proven. This is a good way to prove it -- leak all orders, especially the ones that smell of illegality. Then trust Democratic AGs to bring court cases and hope that the worst of it gets tied up in legal limbo until we can finally flush the Republicans. By reporting this bullshit, this worker has enabled that to happen. We'll see what comes from it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is frankly impossible to do in the modern workspace. Access to everything needed to do the work can be switched off almost instantly. Also, good luck getting financial institutions to comply or even meet with you when they know you're going rogue and don't have the force of government behind you.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

Then make them switch it off.