this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2025
7 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5869 readers
715 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Link from article: This is it: The Assembly Details


I thought of sharing this not so much because I agree with everything said in it, but because I think as a topic, it could be a great conversation starter.

For example at some point he says something I don't agree with:

In 2015, when I was researching in London, we helped set up the Radical Assemblies movement. Thousands took part. Within six months, it collapsed.

Why?

No structure. No clear plan. Too much chaos.

Personally I see this very differently. Not saying that I'm right and he's wrong. Just saying.

I think many of the powerful social movements or just interesting ones actually, after the 2008 crisis and until the pandemic (including the Arab Spring of course), they were somehow connected to online communication. This article's take reminds me of the opinion of some marxists, leninists etc saying "these movements failed because there was no leaders with a clear plan". I don't agree with this kind of thinking.

I don't see them as failures. On the contrary, I see them as part of a bottom-up social process of organising, in order to reclaim our space in the social sphere and in decision making processes. They are part of an evolution, imo.

Please, read my take with a grain of salt and some good faith. I don't claim I am able to resume my limited knowledge and understanding of a decade or so of activism, in a few sentences. It's more of an attempt of mine to start a conversation by talking about some of my thoughts, hoping you will share yours.

no comments (yet)
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here