this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
73 points (86.9% liked)

Europe

2698 readers
1925 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in [email protected]. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @[email protected], @[email protected], or @[email protected].

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/26410527

The EU is spending more money on Russian fossil fuels than on financial aid to Ukraine, a report marking the third anniversary of the invasion has found.

The EU bought €21.9bn (£18.1bn) of Russian oil and gas in the third year of the war, according to estimates from the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (Crea), despite the efforts under way to kick the continent’s addiction to the fuels that fund Vladimir Putin’s war chest.

The amount is one-sixth greater than the €18.7bn the EU allocated to Ukraine in financial aid in 2024, according to a tracker from the Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

From the article itself:

The aid figure does not include military or humanitarian contributions.

I love how you need to read 4 paragraphs, to learn it's just sensationalist trash, made only for the headline.

That said, I do wish more support went to Ukraine.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Be aware that some member states (such as Slovakia, Austria and Hungary) are playing a big role in this, as they have explicitly stated that they do not want to stop consuming Russian gas due to the cheap prices.

While some member states (such as Germany & the Netherlands) are actively reducing the dependence on Russia, others are actively increasing it, which skews the average results and lead to articles like these.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

This does play a re role, but relatively smaller one. EDIT: In regards to Russias total export volume piepline gas is only a smaller aspect. For the direct exports to EU the pipeline Gas does play a larger role. Relative to size Slovakia and Hungary import more from Russia, but in absolute terms France, Belgium and Spain are also importing significant amounts of LNG. I have put the graphic from the source at the end.

https://energyandcleanair.org/december-2024-monthly-analysis-of-russian-fossil-fuel-exports-and-sanctions/

The most value comes from Oil and Oil products exported by ships. About half of the Russian LNG is also sold to EU countries, but it is a relatively small share of the total amount. You can see that the pipeline gas exports have declined strongly over the course of the war. But Oil only has taken a slight reduction.

The website also has graphs where the shipments go. For Turkey and India it is known that they help Russia circumvent EU sanctions, so a lot of the crude oil and oil products going there, end up back in the EU again.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Because fossil fuels provide half of Europe's energy generation, and you can't just give up buying it ¯_(ツ)_/¯

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The source makes a different claim?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Your source probably only refers to electricity. You also have to factor in heating and mobility.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

That part does not include energy imports. Those make up 63% of the EUs energy consumption and are pretty much only fossil fuels like oil, gas and coal.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Well. We could. If we had listened and acted 30 years ago, when we already knew climate change was going to be bad. Now the Leopards are feasting.

[–] SplashJackson 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I thought they put sanctions in place like a few years ago

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

There are sanctions on oil and coal, but none on gas. Russia cut off gas to most EU countries by themself, but last year was still selling gas via Ukraine and ships even more as LNG.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Does somebody know how much profit Russia makes on a Barrel of oil or a kWh/m³ of Gas?

Edit: Changed m³ to kWh

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Is it not measured by mass? A volume of gas could be many amounts based on the pressure.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

You're right. I've googled it since I've fortunately never had Gas, and a big energy company wrote it's measured in kWh/m³, but I guess the latter part doesn't really matter to the end consumer

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

My gas delivery is measured in cubic feet, then multiplied by a tested current BTU into Therms and billed per Therm. Does that make sense?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Yes. It is best to measure gas in terms of its energy content. Natural gas is a mixture of different compounds, mainly methane, but also ethane and small quantities of propane.

The composition is different from source to source. However for information on the scale of countries imports and exports it is often measured by unpressurized volume, because that is much easier to keep track off. And then it does not matter so much, if the gas had 5% more or less kWh/m³

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Well if it's kept at constant pressure/density sure you can measure it in m³.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

It honestly depends on the source of the gas (i.e. cost of extraction and refinement) and transport method (pipeline vs. shipped). It is difficult to average this over a long period of time. You could look at Gazprom's reported profit margin, but again this is not helpful without context.

Prices I've seen are typically quoted in $/mmbtu - it's a weird unit, but it works for whatever reason.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Here is the website and analysis for 12/2024 of the CREA:

https://energyandcleanair.org/december-2024-monthly-analysis-of-russian-fossil-fuel-exports-and-sanctions/

Note that the figure €21.9bn in the article probably only refers to direct imports from Russia. The indirect imports through sanction circumvention using mainly India and Turkey likely adds another significant amount on top, however it is difficult to quantify.

Also since the discussion came up in regards to the German Left party, who did well in Sundays election. This is exactly what they mean, when they say that they want to focus on sanctions instead of weapon deliveries. The EU has been bankrolling Russias war effort well into 2023 and 2024. If you arm both sides in a war, it mainly serves to increase their losses, rather than changing the tide of the war.