this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2025
39 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

1970 readers
302 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @[email protected].

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In short:

Meta has removed a page that published two dozen sexually graphic ads that were able to circumvent the platform's auto-review process.

An ABC NEWS Verify analysis of the ads has linked them to a dubious store that is hawking erectile dysfunction supplements and is filled with deceptive practices.

What's next?

The eSafety Commissioner's office asked the social media industry to include proposed safety measures against pornographic materials in draft codes to the commissioner by February 28.

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

the 40-minute ads

40 fucking minutes?????

In the ads, the first frame, used as the default thumbnail on the platform, was of the make-up instructor. During the period of up to a minute where the ad displayed hardcore porn, the instructor appeared again every 15 frames, intermixed with the porn. Once the hardcore porn ad finished, a slowed-down version of the actual make-up tutorial played for approximately 40 minutes, until the end.

Oh, so that's how it worked.

They highlight the challenges the social media giant faces as it comes up against unscrupulous advertisers on its platforms.

Pffffft, there's no "challenge", facebook gets money either way. The only challenge is for the people who use fb and insta for whatever reason.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

crunchy roll have these surprise ads that can be over ten minutes and these folks seem to try to hawk their music videos. I guess its a cheap way for them to get exposure and they are hoping to make it big or something. Anyway one of the first I saw was super inapropriate and was not while watching mature content. swearing and near nudity.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

God yeah, My kid was watching something about 5-6 years ago on youtube and it went from a fucking cartoon to, I shit you not, a 2 hour infomercial about some fitness product.

That's the day I started making sure the kids had adblock.