this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2025
16 points (78.6% liked)

World News

34742 readers
536 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Volodymyr Ariel, a close ally of Poroshenko, says that far from becoming a new Winston Churchill, Zelenskyy had failed to unite the nation. “Simply put, Zelenskyy has not become a true leader,” he says. “He is unable to adapt to the challenges Ukraine faces today. He remains selfish, narcissistic and arrogant in his dealing both within Ukraine and with international partners.”

https://archive.ph/zj9gg#selection-2709.0-2709.379

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Then Russia will probably occupy the entire country. Ukraine won't have anything to fight with, as NATO can't supply them with the quantity needed, and even then, they'd lose to a much larger, motivated army. They simply can't compete militarily.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Seems unlikely given that western Ukraine has a lot of anti-Russian sentiment. The most plausible scenario is that Russia will absorb parts of Ukraine that are pro Russian or neutral, and the rest will be gobbled up by Poland and Romania.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I bet a small portion of the country will remain Ukrainian, but only because no one else is going to willingly add Chernobyl to their country.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Well, that the desired result, but if peace negotiations fail, and the EU keeps arming the Nazi's in Kiev, the Russians will have no choice but to devastate the entire country including Kiev, and any other metro area and leave nothing left. Let's hope it doesn't come to this, but like the US president said, Kiev has no winning cards to play here. But the clowns in Kiev hate Russia so much with EU support that I've got my fingers crossed.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They still don't need to take over all of Ukraine though. They will break the AFU fighting capacity, and then leave western Ukraine to become Europe's problem I imagine. At that point, Europe is gonna be stuck with a non viable state that will require billions to prop up, and if they don't do that then they're gonna have a huge refugee crisis on their hands. Millions of Ukrainian nationalists, who will feel betrayed, flooding in is really the worst possible case scenario for Europe.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Russia won't stop until their objectives are met. They want a demilitarized Ukraine and no National Sectors (fascists) in government or influencing the government. So if they have to hold ground in Western Ukraine until accomplished, they will do so. Unless of course this is covered in the potential peace agreement, then Russia will most likely be content with going as far as the Dnieper River.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

They have to physically hold western Ukraine though. Once the AFU breaks, Russia will dictate terms to the west and whatever remains of Ukraine. Just look at how things unfolded over the past three years with the frontline remaining relatively static until recently. Attrition does not require making territorial gains.